The Cultural Aspects of Design Network has as its aim to
further the understanding of the inter-relationships between cultures and the
physical environment, to improve knowledge of the impact of cultural and social
factors on environmental design and planning, and to expand consciousness of the
myriad of ways in which environments play a role in, and affect, the lives of
people and other living beings. Members of this network are interested in
research leading to culturally appropriate and responsive design. Current
research interests include vernacular architecture, domestic space, housing,
public space, cross-cultural variation in design, religion, migration of people
and adjustments related to design, workplace design, native cultures, modern and
hybrid cultures, power issues in design, symbolism, meaning, socio-cultural
context of design. On the pragmatic side, members are interested in consultancy,
policy, designing and planning communities with special consideration of
culture, and in culturally appropriate, responsive and responsible
design.
|
|
Is Humanitarian Design the New Imperialism? |
|
By: Bruce Nussbaum
In: Fast Company's Co Design
"Emily Pilloton's Design Revolution Road Show, the physical embodiment of her non-profit Project H Design rolled into New York a few weeks ago stopping at Metropolis, the Cooper Hewitt National Design Museum and ICFF. Yes, Project H is hot in U.S. and European design circles, almost as sizzling as IDEO, the Acumen Fund, and One Laptop Per Child.
And why not? Emily’s Project H is a pure play in using design to do good. It doesn’t get better than this mission statement:
Project H Design connects the power of design to the people who need it most, and the places where it can make a real and lasting difference. We are a team of designers, architects, and builders engaging locally through partnerships with social service organizations, communities, and schools to improve the quality of life for the socially overlooked. Our five-tenet design process (There is no design without action; We design WITH, not FOR; We document, share and measure; We start locally and scale globally, We design systems, not stuff) results in simple and effective design solutions for those without access to creative capital. Our scalable long-term initiatives focus on improving environments, services, products, and experiences for youth and K-12 education institutions in the U.S. through systems-level design thinking and deep community engagements. WE BELIEVE DESIGN CAN CHANGE THE WORLD.
So do I. But whose design? Which solutions? What problems?"
Read More: |
|
|
Activist architecture and transformative design in NY, Mumbai, Bangalore and the Mississippi Delta |
|
In: Places - The Design Observer Group
Preparing Ground: An Interview with Anuradha Mathur + Dilip da Cunha
"Anuradha Mathur and Dilip da Cunha are principals of the design firm Mathur/da Cunha, based in Philadelphia and Bangalore. Trained in architecture and landscape architecture, at the Center for Environmental Planning and Technnology in Ahmedabad and the University of Pennsylvania, Mathur is associate chair of landscape architecture at the Penn School of Design. Trained in architecture and planning, at Bangalore University, the School of Planning and Architecture at New Delhi, Berkeley and MIT, da Cunha is on the faculty of the Parsons School of Design and the Penn School of Design.
In more than a decade of interdisciplinary practice, as designers, teachers and writers, Mathur and da Cunha have focused on the cultural and ecological issues of contested landscapes. In projects, exhibitions and books, they have sought answers to seemingly simple but difficult and indeed fundamental questions — what is a river? where is the city? Their answers often take the form of intricate and original visualizations — what they term "photoworks" and "photowalks," sectional drawings and collages that at once construct and peel away the many layers of complex landscapes."
Read More |
|
A modern approach to creating place |
|
From blog: PRAIREFORM: Every day excursions in the urban landscape
"Jacques Tati was a master of poking fun at hyper-austere modernist homes, their accompanying landscapes, and their followers. The infamous scene in “Mon Oncle” of his accidental pruning of two espaliered trees that had been depressingly planted along a blank wall is so pleasantly memorable in its deadpan-slapstick critique of modernism. It pokes fun not only at the excessive austerity and fussiness of the landscape, but also at the generic placelessness of it – particularly when juxtaposed with the rather hodgepodge, roughhewn landscape of the older part of town. In part what we love about “Mon Oncle” is not simply how funny it is, but how prescient it was. To this day, card-carrying modernist designers continue to create prototypical Mon Oncle landscapes, apparently unaware of the comically uncanny similarities they hold with the landscape of the film"
Read More... |
|
Delicious Eye Candy: Kengo Kuma's Ghostly Land Art |
|
By: Suzanne Labarre
In: Fast Company
Date: Thu Jun 10, 2010
"From the Japanese architect Kengo Kuma comes CCCWall, a gorgeous land-art installation at the University of Milan. Pretty as the pictures are, you've got to see the video of the thing in action to appreciate how beautiful it is...Unveiled during Milan Design Week in April, the installation is a screen of sheer organza curtains strung over a secluded quadrangle like a clothes line, with ceramic tiles and stones seeded below. It was inspired by Kuma's own architectural work for the ceramic company Casalgrande Padana outside Bologna"
Read More...
|
|
Environment vs. Preservation? |
|
Cities face wrecking ball to meet carbon targets
From: The Times
By: Rebecca O’Connor, Property Correspondent
Huge expanses of British town and city centres built in the Sixties and Seventies may have to be torn down to meet carbon emission standards for buildings.
In an interview with The Times, the Government’s new chief construction adviser said that there may be no choice but to demolish buildings put up in those decades because it is impossible to refurbish them to a sufficiently high standard.
Paul Morrell, who took up his new post at the Department for Business, Innovation & Skills at the end of November last year, said: “In the Sixties, everything was built cheaper, faster and nastier. If you are going to try to fix buildings, then really you won’t have too many problems with anything built earlier than the Fifties or after the Eighties.
Read more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|